| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 24: |
Line 24: |
| | | | |
| | There are a huge amount of columns in it, and I think it's getting harder to read and process everything. Compiling every single feature in a single place may not be the best idea, especially if we're talking about features only a few emulators support or even plan on supporting. This also applies to other pages but this one illustrates this problem the most, for me. I think we should bring back separate tables in dedicated sections, and keep general features in the main table. [[User:FulguroBoy|FulguroBoy]] ([[User talk:FulguroBoy|talk]]) 13:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC) | | There are a huge amount of columns in it, and I think it's getting harder to read and process everything. Compiling every single feature in a single place may not be the best idea, especially if we're talking about features only a few emulators support or even plan on supporting. This also applies to other pages but this one illustrates this problem the most, for me. I think we should bring back separate tables in dedicated sections, and keep general features in the main table. [[User:FulguroBoy|FulguroBoy]] ([[User talk:FulguroBoy|talk]]) 13:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC) |
| − |
| |
| − | I respectfully disagree with you about that. Actually I think separating tables/divs in dedicated sections = "it's getting harder to read and process everything." [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]])
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Well, while we're on the subject, I think it makes sense to remove the "libretro" column - it only applies to ParaLLEl-N64 and Mupen64Plus-Next, for which it's already pointed out they're libretro cores, and technically MAME, which nobody in their right mind uses for N64, let alone on the libretro core. [[User:GPDP1|GPDP1]] ([[User:GPDP1|talk]])
| |
| − |
| |
| − | If we're removing the libretro column for this article, we might as well remove the column for all articles. I think the libretro column should stay. [[User:Jadasse|Jadasse]] ([[User:Jadasse|talk]])
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == "Accuracy" column instead of "Plugins", what do you guys think? ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Example===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div style="max-width:100%; overflow:auto;">
| |
| − | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|Name
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|Platform(s)
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|Latest version
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|Accuracy
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|Controller<br>Pak
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|Rumble<br>Pak
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|[[#Transfer Pak emulation|Transfer<br>Pak]]
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|[[#64DD emulation|64DD]]
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|[[#N64 Mouse|N64<br>Mouse]]
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|<small>Texture<br/>enhancement</small>
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|Netplay
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|<abbr title="Free/Libre and Open-Source Software">FLOSS</abbr>
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|Active
| |
| − | ! scope="col"|[[Recommended emulators|Recommended]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | !colspan="15"|PC / x86
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[[RMG]]
| |
| − | |align=left|{{Icon|Windows|Linux}}
| |
| − | |[https://github.com/Rosalie241/RMG/releases {{RMGVer}}]<br >[https://github.com/Rosalie241/RMG/actions Dev]
| |
| − | |<small>[[Recommended N64 plugins|Plugin<br/>Dependent]]</small>
| |
| − | |{{✓}}
| |
| − | |{{✓}}
| |
| − | |{{✓}}
| |
| − | |{{✓}}
| |
| − | |{{✗}}
| |
| − | |{{✓}}
| |
| − | |{{~}}<
| |
| − | |{{✓}}
| |
| − | |{{✓}}
| |
| − | |{{✓}}
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]])
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I think it would be an excellent idea, since it would provide a good overview on how precise the non-plugins emulators are, especially on console and mobile, and we would get rid of those question marks [[User:FulguroBoy|FulguroBoy]] ([[User talk:FulguroBoy|talk]]) 14:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Done. [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 22:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Bringing back RetroAchievements column? ==
| |
| − | Should we wait for another emulator to support "RetroAchievements" because at the moment, only two libretro core (Mupen64Plus-Next and ParaLLEl-N64) supports this feature.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :: https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php?title=Nintendo_64_emulators&diff=52557&oldid=52550#Emulators
| |
| − | :: https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php?title=Nintendo_64_emulators&diff=52604&oldid=52557
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 22:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | RA support added to [https://github.com/TASEmulators/BizHawk/pull/3407 BizHawk with 2.9 version]. (RA supported emulators atm: Mupen64Plus-Next, ParaLLEl-N64 and BizHawk)
| |
| − | [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 18:59, 7 Apr 2023 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php?title=Nintendo_64_emulators&curid=334&diff=55305&oldid=55214 Done]. [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 16:03, 11 Apr 2023 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Parallel Launcher ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Why isn't [https://parallel-launcher.ca/ Parallel Launcher] recommended? It combines the accuracy of ParaLLEl-N64 to an interface that doesn't make you scream in frustration! -[[Special:Contributions/172.69.3.147|172.69.3.147]] 03:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | You could add that to the comparison paragraph.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == kaizen ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | interesting new project: https://github.com/SimoneN64/Kaizen#roadmap
| |
| − | [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 22:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
| |
