PC Emulator Comparisons: Difference between revisions

Ahayri (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 271: Line 271:
|-
|-
| [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows XP]]
| [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows XP]]
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT>86Box, PCem and PCBox supports these OS'es but even these emulators have limited [[#x86 CPU's]], [[#Graphics_Cards_.26_GPU.27s]] and [[#Mainboards]] support for more demanding NT-based operating systems, performance will be unbearable anyway. Recommended to use hypervisor solution for these OS'es (See [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows XP/Vista]] and [[Windows_95/98/ME_emulators|Windows 9x]] pages).</ref>
| {{Y}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT>86Box, PCem and PCBox supports these OS'es but even these emulators have limited [[#x86 CPU's]], [[#Graphics_Cards_.26_GPU.27s]] and [[#Mainboards]] support for more demanding NT-based operating systems, performance will be unbearable anyway. Recommended to use hypervisor solution for these OS'es (See [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows XP/Vista]] and [[Windows_95/98/ME_emulators|Windows 9x]] pages).</ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
Line 282: Line 282:
|-
|-
| [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows Vista]]
| [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows Vista]]
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{Y}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{N}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref>
| {{N}}<ref group=N name=DOSBoxandForksNT></ref>
| {{N}}<ref group=N name=DOSBoxandForksNT></ref>