Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:ROM & ISO sites

2,842 bytes added, 03:00, 1 April 2019
Different formatting?
Can't get https://a0.ww.np.dl.playstation.net/tpl/np/{game_id}/{game_id}-ver.xml game update url to work. Any other alternatives?
 
Archive.org wants [email protected] verified. You won't be logging in until you do that, methinks.
 
[email protected] no longer works at all.
:Just create your own account. --[[User:LilShootDawg|LilShootDawg]] ([[User talk:LilShootDawg|talk]]) 08:07, 5 March 2019 (EST)
 
Nah.
 
== Why 2 pages? ==
 
Why are there two pages for ROM and ISO sites? (Example this one doesn't have emuparadise and the other one does.) --[[User:LilShootDawg|The man formerly known as LilShootDawg]] ([[User talk:LilShootDawg|talk]]) 07:50, 23 August 2018 (EDT)
 
== Different formatting? ==
 
There seems to be a lot of links, do you think it would be better to start using a table format or would that be too difficult/useless?
I was thinking maybe something like this:
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
! URL
! Platform(s)
! Notes
|-
| [http://www.atarimania.com/rom_collection_archive_atari_2600_roms.html Atarimania]
| Atari 2600
| Contains a complete Atari 2600 ROM set.
|-
| [https://www.gamulator.com/ Gamulator]
| Retro
| Small website where you can download all sort of retro console ROM's and ISO's.
|-
| [https://www.pokemonlog.com/ Pokemonlog]
| Pokemon ROMs & ROM Hacks
| Small website where you can get the latest Pokemon ROM's and Pokemon rom hacks.
|-
|...
|...
|...
|}
 
It's debatable if a "platforms" category would be necessary as a lot of the times sites contain a variety of platforms and usually the notes would say what ones are included/excluded, but if it were to work it would be generally classified under these three options:
*Retro - mainly consoles from up to [http://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/Category:Fifth-generation_video_game_consoles fifth-generation]
*Modern - mainly consoles greater than fifth-generation
*Varies - the "catch-all" group that doesn't have a distinct timeline
Anything else do you guys think should be added to the table? --[[User:Skylark|Skylark]] ([[User talk:Skylark|talk]]) 20:16, 25 February 2019 (EST)
:Maybe something like this:
:{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
! URL
! Reg.
Required?
! Rate
Limited?
! Content
! Notes
|-
| [http://www.romulation.net Romulation]
| Yes
| Yes
| Various
| Useful for Wii, GameCube, Nintendo DS, PlayStation 2 etc, maybe no-intro rips. (account required - use bugmenot or make one with a temp email account) (Many games (including most Nintendo titles) have been DMCA'd as of January 2017)
|-
| [http://coolrom.com.au CoolROM.com]
| No
| No
| Up to 6th-gen.
| Has ROMs and ISOs for various systems spanning from Atari 2600 to PS2. No Nintendo system content whatsoever.
|-
|...
|...
|...
|...
|...
|}
:This way, the "platforms" can be left a little more freeform and it'll be easier to clean the page up a bit. Making it sortable would also be ideal. -[[User:Azure Fang|Azure Fang]] ([[User talk:Azure Fang|talk]]) 23:00, 31 March 2019 (EDT)
29
edits

Navigation menu