Difference between revisions of "Talk:PS1 Tests"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | You should put a rank of emulators at the top based on what passed the most tests to the least. | ||
+ | |||
==Condensing GPU Table== | ==Condensing GPU Table== | ||
I was thinking of condensing some of the GPU tests as some tests are made up of many smaller tests. For instance 'HO RECT' is made up of 8 different rectangle tests, and if it doesn't pass them all it gets a fail, so I think things like Poly Mono (and the other primitives) should do that as well. | I was thinking of condensing some of the GPU tests as some tests are made up of many smaller tests. For instance 'HO RECT' is made up of 8 different rectangle tests, and if it doesn't pass them all it gets a fail, so I think things like Poly Mono (and the other primitives) should do that as well. | ||
It wouldn't really be a loss of information as nothing's passed just 1 rectangle test and failed the rest, and it would cut down the table by ~100 columns. --[[User:SonofUgly|SonofUgly]] ([[User talk:SonofUgly|talk]]) 15:46, 15 January 2015 (EST) | It wouldn't really be a loss of information as nothing's passed just 1 rectangle test and failed the rest, and it would cut down the table by ~100 columns. --[[User:SonofUgly|SonofUgly]] ([[User talk:SonofUgly|talk]]) 15:46, 15 January 2015 (EST) | ||
:+1. It does look a bit bulky at the moment; as long as we're sure it's all-or-nothing for those tests then I see no point showing sub-tests. [[User:Murrigan|Murrigan]] ([[User talk:Murrigan|talk]]) 16:02, 15 January 2015 (EST) | :+1. It does look a bit bulky at the moment; as long as we're sure it's all-or-nothing for those tests then I see no point showing sub-tests. [[User:Murrigan|Murrigan]] ([[User talk:Murrigan|talk]]) 16:02, 15 January 2015 (EST) |
Revision as of 20:05, 16 January 2015
You should put a rank of emulators at the top based on what passed the most tests to the least.
Condensing GPU Table
I was thinking of condensing some of the GPU tests as some tests are made up of many smaller tests. For instance 'HO RECT' is made up of 8 different rectangle tests, and if it doesn't pass them all it gets a fail, so I think things like Poly Mono (and the other primitives) should do that as well. It wouldn't really be a loss of information as nothing's passed just 1 rectangle test and failed the rest, and it would cut down the table by ~100 columns. --SonofUgly (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2015 (EST)