Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

PC Emulator Comparisons

88 bytes added, 23 February
no edit summary
This page compares [[POS_(Pong_Consoles)_CPUs_and_Other_Chips#x86_CPUs|emulators of PC hardware ]] against each other and shows what they can and can't do
==Enhancements==
| {{Y}}
| {{Unknown}}
| {{~}}<ref group=N3 name=DOSBoxForksCPU><br/>Unlike emulators like 86Box or PCem which aim for accurate execution, DOSBox forks prioritize performance by [https://github.com/joncampbell123/dosbox-x/wiki/Guide:CPU-settings-in-DOSBox%E2%80%90X/d4205d856c3da5787fc39f845452d184fbcb8ec4#is-dosbox-x-cycle-accurate emulating one instruction per emulated-cycle]. This approach simplifies internal CPU mechanics and ignores real clock frequency or FLOPs of the emulated system. While this sacrifices perfect accuracy, it leads to significantly faster emulation and still has broader software compatibility compared to other emulators like QEMU or Bochs. However, some niche software may still encounter compatibility limitations. Therefore, DOSBox forks remain a powerful option for casual users and performance-intensive tasks, offering a balance between compatibility and speed. See DOSBox Pure: [https://github.com/schellingb/dosbox-pure/issues/301 MMX Instruction Set Support] issue page and [[POS_(Pong_Consoles)_CPUs_and_Other_Chips#Comparisons|comparisonsDescriptions]] section for more information.</ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N3 name=DOSBoxForksCPU></ref>
| {{~}}<ref group=N3 name=DOSBoxForksCPU></ref>
10,938
edits

Navigation menu