Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:PC Emulator Comparisons

82 bytes removed, Wednesday at 12:48
UTM?
:: + I previously added UTM to the [[Hypervisors]] page because of its virtualization capabilities. However, I don't think UTM emulator belongs to this page '''at this moment'''. Perhaps we should wait for further development or news about the project before adding it here. [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 11:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
::: - Agree. UTM is kinda in a unique position in that it does both emulation and virtualization. And from my understanding if you want to use VirGL (which is Linux only) you have to run the guest in the emulation backend as it's not supported on the virtualization backend. [[User:Phredreeke|Phredreeke]] ([[User talk:Phredreeke|talk]]) 11:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
:::: + [[Emulation_accuracy|Virtualization techniques are popular among emulators]], but yeah Yeah UTM certainly stands out in its approach. Regarding VirGL, since we already mentioned that project in the [[Windows 2000/XP/Vista emulators#Type 1 Hypervisors]] section, it might be best to add UTM there as well for consistency? [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
== Operating system support column ==
11,976
edits

Navigation menu