Editing PC Emulator Comparisons
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 274: | Line 274: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows XP]] | | [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows XP]] | ||
− | | {{ | + | | {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT>86Box, PCem and PCBox supports these OS'es but even these emulators have limited [[#x86 CPU's]], [[#Graphics_Cards_.26_GPU.27s]] and [[#Mainboards]] support for more demanding NT-based operating systems, performance will be unbearable anyway. Recommended to use hypervisor solution for these OS'es (See [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows XP/Vista]] and [[Windows_95/98/ME_emulators|Windows 9x]] pages).</ref> |
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref> | | {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref> | ||
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref> | | {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref> | ||
Line 285: | Line 285: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows Vista]] | | [[Windows_2000/XP/Vista_emulators|Windows Vista]] | ||
− | | {{ | + | | {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref> |
− | | {{ | + | | {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref> |
| {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref> | | {{~}}<ref group=N name=86BoxandPCemNT></ref> | ||
| {{N}}<ref group=N name=DOSBoxandForksNT></ref> | | {{N}}<ref group=N name=DOSBoxandForksNT></ref> |