Editing No$
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
==Review== | ==Review== | ||
− | For general purpose emulation, don't bother with these unless you happen to use | + | For general purpose emulation, don't bother with these unless you happen to use a very old/outdated computer, these emulators are built around [[Emulation Accuracy#Low_accuracy|speedhacks]], have lower compatibility and are prone to bugs. Use the emulators for the systems listed on the main page instead. |
The main drawing point of the NO$ emulators are the excellent debug features they often have (only matched by the likes of [[FCEUX]]), such as memory viewers and disassemblers, making them very useful for people who are into system development - whether to produce ROM hacks or homebrew, but still marred by its lower compatibility, austere interface, and tight coupling to the Win32 API (though they run fine under a wrapper such as Wine). | The main drawing point of the NO$ emulators are the excellent debug features they often have (only matched by the likes of [[FCEUX]]), such as memory viewers and disassemblers, making them very useful for people who are into system development - whether to produce ROM hacks or homebrew, but still marred by its lower compatibility, austere interface, and tight coupling to the Win32 API (though they run fine under a wrapper such as Wine). |