Difference between revisions of "Talk:ROM/ISO sites"

From Emulation General Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replying to “F0rZ3R0”, “f**kily” is now censored.)
(Better.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Regarding portalroms.com ==
 
== Regarding portalroms.com ==
 
I'd like to ask why Dipswitch is so hellbent on keeping portalroms, since it is a broken website that doesn't work with any web browser due to how f**kily put together it is. Unless there are certain instructions on how to properly use the site, in which those should be listed. [[User:F0rZ3r0|F0rZ3r0]] ([[User talk:F0rZ3r0|talk]]) 23:39, 17 December 2017 (EST)
 
I'd like to ask why Dipswitch is so hellbent on keeping portalroms, since it is a broken website that doesn't work with any web browser due to how f**kily put together it is. Unless there are certain instructions on how to properly use the site, in which those should be listed. [[User:F0rZ3r0|F0rZ3r0]] ([[User talk:F0rZ3r0|talk]]) 23:39, 17 December 2017 (EST)
:It's possibly the website is broken, since I clicked on “DOWNLOAD!” and nothing happened. I think the website is a scam. {{User:MarioMario456/sig|19:59 3/03/2018}}
+
:It's possible the website is a scam, since I clicked on “DOWNLOAD!” and nothing happened. {{User:MarioMario456/sig|19:59 3/03/2018}}
  
 
== Reverted Download Section ==
 
== Reverted Download Section ==

Revision as of 20:00, 3 March 2018

Regarding portalroms.com

I'd like to ask why Dipswitch is so hellbent on keeping portalroms, since it is a broken website that doesn't work with any web browser due to how f**kily put together it is. Unless there are certain instructions on how to properly use the site, in which those should be listed. F0rZ3r0 (talk) 23:39, 17 December 2017 (EST)

It's possible the website is a scam, since I clicked on “DOWNLOAD!” and nothing happened. MarioMario456TC19:59 3/03/2018

Reverted Download Section

When I checked this page today, a majority of the Downloads section was gone and what was there was repeated 4 times. I've reverted the changes as best as I know how to how the section was before the change that removed -11,181 characters from the article. --ElizabethNoir (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2018 (EST)

There's an ongoing overhaul to this page precisely because of how much it's linked to elsewhere and to adress that need to the best interest of this wiki and the ressources within. The repeated links are a mistake, and a regrettable display of a lack of effort. I will fix that shortly. Dipswitch (talk) 22:18, 7 February 2018 (EST)
Done. Dipswitch (talk) 23:14, 7 February 2018 (EST)