Difference between revisions of "Talk:PS1 Tests"

From Emulation General Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==Condensing GPU Table== I was thinking of condensing some of the GPU tests as some tests are made up of many smaller tests. For instance 'HO RECT' is made up of 8 different r...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
I was thinking of condensing some of the GPU tests as some tests are made up of many smaller tests. For instance 'HO RECT' is made up of 8 different rectangle tests, and if it doesn't pass them all it gets a fail, so I think things like Poly Mono (and the other primitives) should do that as well.  
 
I was thinking of condensing some of the GPU tests as some tests are made up of many smaller tests. For instance 'HO RECT' is made up of 8 different rectangle tests, and if it doesn't pass them all it gets a fail, so I think things like Poly Mono (and the other primitives) should do that as well.  
 
It wouldn't really be a loss of information as nothing's passed just 1 rectangle test and failed the rest, and it would cut down the table by ~100 columns. --[[User:SonofUgly|SonofUgly]] ([[User talk:SonofUgly|talk]]) 15:46, 15 January 2015 (EST)
 
It wouldn't really be a loss of information as nothing's passed just 1 rectangle test and failed the rest, and it would cut down the table by ~100 columns. --[[User:SonofUgly|SonofUgly]] ([[User talk:SonofUgly|talk]]) 15:46, 15 January 2015 (EST)
 +
:+1. It does look a bit bulky at the moment; as long as we're sure it's all-or-nothing for those tests then I see no point showing sub-tests. [[User:Murrigan|Murrigan]] ([[User talk:Murrigan|talk]]) 16:02, 15 January 2015 (EST)

Revision as of 21:02, 15 January 2015

Condensing GPU Table

I was thinking of condensing some of the GPU tests as some tests are made up of many smaller tests. For instance 'HO RECT' is made up of 8 different rectangle tests, and if it doesn't pass them all it gets a fail, so I think things like Poly Mono (and the other primitives) should do that as well. It wouldn't really be a loss of information as nothing's passed just 1 rectangle test and failed the rest, and it would cut down the table by ~100 columns. --SonofUgly (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2015 (EST)

+1. It does look a bit bulky at the moment; as long as we're sure it's all-or-nothing for those tests then I see no point showing sub-tests. Murrigan (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2015 (EST)