Editing User talk:212.252.97.52
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
- 06:59, 3 December 2018 Bot (talk | contribs) blocked 212.252.97.52 (talk) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation disabled, email disabled)
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Standover Tactics== | ==Standover Tactics== | ||
Stop standing over and/or being quite the bully to any and all other users/editors who have put up accurate information including exact versioning numbering and methodologies. If an emulator's official website, e.g. higan's, shows v092, v096, v102, v106 and etc; and that '''MOST''' other emulation-related websites use the same exact numbering, then THERE IS NO DISCERNIBLE or stressed need to pick your own different 'opinion' and suddenly add a dot in it, e.g. "v0.106". No, it's not accurate and rather needs to be avoided. Though, some other users tend to rely on the dotted number in the [[Template:HiganVer|template page for higan's emulator]] specifically when it is updated with a new version. But that's because one user started it and then the others followed it there probably without realising that it was a bit off. But when you see the links to other emulator branches based on bsnes or higan in the [[Super_Nintendo_emulators#Emulators|SNES chart]], then a strong preference is that their version numbering '''needs''' to be followed. Also even you were wrong in that you '''KEPT BOTH''' the "v" and initial "0" at the start of version numbers of those emu forks (Different from the template page's numbering with just the initial "0", but I'm leaving that page alone even though I think it's a bit off). Don't be so '''incredibly''' fussy/pedantic! [[User:ObiKKa|ObiKKa]] ([[User talk:ObiKKa|talk]]) 15:38, 30 November 2018 (EST) | Stop standing over and/or being quite the bully to any and all other users/editors who have put up accurate information including exact versioning numbering and methodologies. If an emulator's official website, e.g. higan's, shows v092, v096, v102, v106 and etc; and that '''MOST''' other emulation-related websites use the same exact numbering, then THERE IS NO DISCERNIBLE or stressed need to pick your own different 'opinion' and suddenly add a dot in it, e.g. "v0.106". No, it's not accurate and rather needs to be avoided. Though, some other users tend to rely on the dotted number in the [[Template:HiganVer|template page for higan's emulator]] specifically when it is updated with a new version. But that's because one user started it and then the others followed it there probably without realising that it was a bit off. But when you see the links to other emulator branches based on bsnes or higan in the [[Super_Nintendo_emulators#Emulators|SNES chart]], then a strong preference is that their version numbering '''needs''' to be followed. Also even you were wrong in that you '''KEPT BOTH''' the "v" and initial "0" at the start of version numbers of those emu forks (Different from the template page's numbering with just the initial "0", but I'm leaving that page alone even though I think it's a bit off). Don't be so '''incredibly''' fussy/pedantic! [[User:ObiKKa|ObiKKa]] ([[User talk:ObiKKa|talk]]) 15:38, 30 November 2018 (EST) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Emulation issues == | == Emulation issues == | ||
Dreamcast emulation isn't very good. | Dreamcast emulation isn't very good. |