Difference between revisions of "Talk:Redream"
(Created page with "Does anyone have an archive of the Gitlab statement at this link?[https://gitlab.com/inolen/redream/issues/301#note_53633080] The page has been deleted, as discussed here[http...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does anyone have an archive of the Gitlab statement at this link?[https://gitlab.com/inolen/redream/issues/301#note_53633080] The page has been deleted, as discussed here[https://gitlab.com/inolen/redream/-/issues/957] and here[https://www.reddit.com/r/emulation/comments/7p2rik/redream_has_gone_closedsource/] (partial archive of that thread here[https://web.archive.org/web/20211129111434/https://www.unddit.com/r/emulation/comments/7p2rik/redream_has_gone_closedsource/]) [[User:Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea|Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea]] ([[User talk:Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea|talk]]) 11:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC) | Does anyone have an archive of the Gitlab statement at this link?[https://gitlab.com/inolen/redream/issues/301#note_53633080] The page has been deleted, as discussed here[https://gitlab.com/inolen/redream/-/issues/957] and here[https://www.reddit.com/r/emulation/comments/7p2rik/redream_has_gone_closedsource/] (partial archive of that thread here[https://web.archive.org/web/20211129111434/https://www.unddit.com/r/emulation/comments/7p2rik/redream_has_gone_closedsource/]) [[User:Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea|Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea]] ([[User talk:Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea|talk]]) 11:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Found a partial one[https://archive.md/87JSP]. Issue copied below, but response still missing: | ||
| + | Violation of the GPL3 licence of your project | ||
| + | |||
| + | Your last answer about the issue on Github : " Closing this as a.) the project has moved to https://gitlab.com/inolen/redream b.) i will write about the source code transition in the next week or two as we wrap up the current milestone " | ||
| + | |||
| + | You have too disabled the issues section on Github, but I'm here now. I see now we, users, can't download the source code of the project on Gitlab ( need special access ). And we still need to pay to have binaries of the software | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is it your answer for the communauty and the future users of the project ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | If we can't download now the source code, we can say that you violate the GPL3 licence now. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[[User:Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea|Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea]] ([[User talk:Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea|talk]]) 11:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:32, 29 November 2021
Does anyone have an archive of the Gitlab statement at this link?[1] The page has been deleted, as discussed here[2] and here[3] (partial archive of that thread here[4]) Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea (talk) 11:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Found a partial one[5]. Issue copied below, but response still missing:
Violation of the GPL3 licence of your project
Your last answer about the issue on Github : " Closing this as a.) the project has moved to https://gitlab.com/inolen/redream b.) i will write about the source code transition in the next week or two as we wrap up the current milestone "
You have too disabled the issues section on Github, but I'm here now. I see now we, users, can't download the source code of the project on Gitlab ( need special access ). And we still need to pay to have binaries of the software
Is it your answer for the communauty and the future users of the project ?
If we can't download now the source code, we can say that you violate the GPL3 licence now.
- Cf81e83dd1df973f70c9c82e29c314ea (talk) 11:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
