Difference between revisions of "Talk:PuNES"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(→Mappers: new section) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<span>Take a look at the TAS accuracy table, test <span style="font-weight:bold">(blargg_ppu_tests_2005.09.15b/power_up_palette)</span> it says Fail #02, but now <span style="color:DarkGreen;font-weight:bold">puNES</span> is returning #01 which is a pass</span>.[[User:Chipsum|Chipsum]] ([[User talk:Chipsum|talk]]) 17:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC) | <span>Take a look at the TAS accuracy table, test <span style="font-weight:bold">(blargg_ppu_tests_2005.09.15b/power_up_palette)</span> it says Fail #02, but now <span style="color:DarkGreen;font-weight:bold">puNES</span> is returning #01 which is a pass</span>.[[User:Chipsum|Chipsum]] ([[User talk:Chipsum|talk]]) 17:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Mappers == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hello. The official puNES repository has a table with all supported mappers. Instead of duplicating it here (or leaving this article outdated), it'd be better to just add a link to the official table: https://github.com/punesemu/puNES#electric_plug-supported-mappers . -- [[Special:Contributions/172.70.34.113|172.70.34.113]] 03:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:16, 8 March 2024
puNES Accuracy
I did all the possible accuracy tests on each of Mesen, Mesen2, FCEUX, puNES..
I found out that puNES scored the best surpassing Mesen2, it's just that TAS did not update their page about NES accuracy tests.
Take a look at the TAS accuracy table, test (blargg_ppu_tests_2005.09.15b/power_up_palette) it says Fail #02, but now puNES is returning #01 which is a pass.Chipsum (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Mappers
Hello. The official puNES repository has a table with all supported mappers. Instead of duplicating it here (or leaving this article outdated), it'd be better to just add a link to the official table: https://github.com/punesemu/puNES#electric_plug-supported-mappers . -- 172.70.34.113 03:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)