Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mednafen"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Undo revision 21536 by 176.88.21.199 (talk)) |
LilShootDawg (talk | contribs) m (→Second part of Width Corrections) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
"All of these come with the RetroArch BIOS pack and are correctly named." | "All of these come with the RetroArch BIOS pack and are correctly named." | ||
+ | |||
+ | == this is awful lmao == | ||
+ | |||
+ | like this is actually unusable it cant even launch lol you call this a program? | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Second part of Width Corrections == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The PS1 part doesn't work since the setting is a boolean value which is only 1 and 0. --[[User:LilShootDawg|LilShootDawg]] ([[User talk:LilShootDawg|talk]]) 12:22, 8 November 2019 (EST) |
Revision as of 16:07, 10 November 2019
Contents
Using Mednafen
Maybe create a sub-section for every system that Mednafen supports, and one general section for common settings or something. It looks kinda confusing right now. --Jackos (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2014 (EDT)
PC-FX BIOS incorrectly named
Article says pcfx.rom, but file in 'Retroarch BIOS Pack' is named pcfx.bios. Unsure as to which file is the right one, so I'll leave it to someone with more experience with PC-FX emulation. Also, thanks for the amazing guide.
"All of these come with the RetroArch BIOS pack and are correctly named."
this is awful lmao
like this is actually unusable it cant even launch lol you call this a program?
Second part of Width Corrections
The PS1 part doesn't work since the setting is a boolean value which is only 1 and 0. --LilShootDawg (talk) 12:22, 8 November 2019 (EST)