Difference between revisions of "Talk:Game Boy/Game Boy Color emulators"
(Tested on my flash cart just to make sure) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
dmg_sound | dmg_sound | ||
− | CGB = fails 08,09,10,11,12 | + | CGB = fails 08,09,10,11,12 (fails on real CGB and AGB hardware as well) |
DMG = fails 01 | DMG = fails 01 |
Revision as of 17:51, 4 March 2018
SameBoy is becoming very accurate lately and has a great libretro core to boot. Should we recommend it? - Syboxez
- I don't know the answer to this but just wanted to stop by and say thank you for asking as opposed to just changing it. I wish more people would do that. We'll see how this one goes! Karasuhebi (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2018 (EST)
Just ran blargg's GB tests on SameBoy using real bootroms (same results with the included open source bootroms) and my results are:
Sameboy:
cgb_sound = 100%
cpu_intrs = 100%
dmg_sound
CGB = fails 08,09,10,11,12 (fails on real CGB and AGB hardware as well)
DMG = fails 01
instr_timing = 100%
interrupt_time = 100%
mem_timing = 100%
mem_timing-2 = 100%
OAM_bug = Failed Causes, Scanline timing, Timing bug, Timing effect, and Instr Effect, passes everything else
halt_bug = 100%
Compared to existing emulators: http://tasvideos.org/EmulatorResources/GBAccuracyTests.html
Barring the DMG_Sound tests, SameBoy is on par with Gambatte and BGB accuracy-wise. Also SameBoy is active and open source, unlike Gambatte (activity-wise) and BGB (source code). I think we should recommend it. --Syboxez (talk) 12:42, 4 March 2018 (EST)