Editing Talk:PC Emulator Comparisons

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 46: Line 46:
 
:: + I previously added UTM to the [[Hypervisors]] page because of its virtualization capabilities. However, I don't think UTM emulator belongs to this page '''at this moment'''. Perhaps we should wait for further development or news about the project before adding it here.  [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 11:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 
:: + I previously added UTM to the [[Hypervisors]] page because of its virtualization capabilities. However, I don't think UTM emulator belongs to this page '''at this moment'''. Perhaps we should wait for further development or news about the project before adding it here.  [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 11:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 
::: - Agree. UTM is kinda in a unique position in that it does both emulation and virtualization. And from my understanding if you want to use VirGL (which is Linux only) you have to run the guest in the emulation backend as it's not supported on the virtualization backend. [[User:Phredreeke|Phredreeke]] ([[User talk:Phredreeke|talk]]) 11:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 
::: - Agree. UTM is kinda in a unique position in that it does both emulation and virtualization. And from my understanding if you want to use VirGL (which is Linux only) you have to run the guest in the emulation backend as it's not supported on the virtualization backend. [[User:Phredreeke|Phredreeke]] ([[User talk:Phredreeke|talk]]) 11:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
:::: + Yeah UTM certainly stands out in its approach.  Regarding VirGL, since we already mentioned that project in the [[Windows 2000/XP/Vista emulators#Type 1 Hypervisors]] section, it might be best to add UTM there as well for consistency? [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
+
:::: + [[Emulation_accuracy|Virtualization techniques are popular among emulators]], but yeah UTM certainly stands out in its approach.  Regarding VirGL, since we already mentioned that project in the [[Windows 2000/XP/Vista emulators#Type 1 Hypervisors]] section, it might be best to add UTM there as well for consistency? [[User:Ahayri|Ahayri]] ([[User talk:Ahayri|talk]]) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
  
 
== Operating system support column ==
 
== Operating system support column ==

Please note that all contributions to Emulation General Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Emulation General Wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)